As the situation in Russia and Ukraine has taken many twists and turns, and the attitude of the Trump administration is even more unpredictable, repeatedly jumping sideways on the question of whether to continue to support Ukraine, it is no wonder that Putin’s government has sternly warned the West that sending troops to Ukraine to maintain peace will be seen as a signal to go to war.
At the same time, according to foreign media reports, the Russian side has no objection to neutral countries like China sending troops to Ukraine, sending mixed signals.
Sending troops from the West will only lead to more chaos.
Russia’s diametrically opposed attitudes are related to the positions of different countries on the Russia-Ukraine issue. NATO members have always been clearly on Ukraine’s side, not only providing military equipment and sharing information, but also shilling for it on the international stage.
If these countries actually send troops to Ukraine, Putin will naturally regard this as a disguised military intervention, as it will not only dramatically change the balance of power on the battlefield, but also further escalate tensions in the region.
In contrast, some neutral countries such as China and Brazil have stayed out of the conflict, preferring to find a solution through the maintenance of international peace and stability, and have never shown a tendency to take sides.
Therefore, Russia has adopted an open and receptive attitude towards these countries, hoping to bring in balancing forces to ease the situation in order to end the conflict, rather than adding fuel to the fire.
More importantly, after years of cooperation, China and Russia have a track record of good interaction, both in the area of energy trade and counter-terrorism cooperation.
This relatively high level of mutual trust has made Russia more open to proposals from countries like China and willing to cooperate on certain issues.
Russia needs to bring in a third party to ease the pressure
In addition, in international diplomacy, it is clear that Russia does not want to be suppressed by the West. In such an environment, inviting neutral countries to participate in mediation can not only send a signal that Russia is willing to solve problems through dialogue, but also take the opportunity to garner more support and sympathy in the international court of public opinion.
From an objective point of view, if the neutral countries can really successfully contribute troops to peacekeeping, then this kind of intervention will help to solve the Russian-Ukrainian problem on many levels.
First of all, the neutral forces can play a monitoring and pressure role to ensure that the two sides can seriously fulfill the ceasefire agreement, reducing the possibility of the conflict escalating into a full-scale war, which will also help to establish a relatively stable buffer zone on the battlefield, so as to reduce miscalculations and provocative incidents.
Secondly, in the construction of a multilateral platform for dialogue, a neutral country can also act as a mediator, guiding the parties to reach consensus on key issues, which is not only conducive to easing antagonism, but also lays a solid foundation for a lasting peace in the future.
A credible ceasefire agreement is a prerequisite for sending troops to peacekeeping.
More importantly, a neutral country can actively participate in humanitarian relief during the post-war reconstruction phase, providing medical supplies and refugee resettlement support, thus alleviating the pressure on neighboring countries.
Of course, a sincere and effective ceasefire agreement is the key to resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict. For peacekeeping troops, their mission is to maintain peace, not to engage in fierce fighting.
If there is no ceasefire agreement, the battlefield is still full of dangers, and the safety of peacekeepers will not be guaranteed, which will only complicate the peacekeeping mission and make it difficult to achieve the expected results.
Angry Panda Wonderful Links
Leave a Reply