Moon Iron horse and golden spears appear on paper, the fire of the beacon burns in the pen.
Wen Tianyue
Iron Horse and Golden Goose on Paper, Beacon and War Flame in Pen
According to Global News, the American entrepreneur Musk recently made sharp remarks on the social platform X again against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO, calling for a comprehensive and in-depth reform of the organization. Previously, U.S. Republican Senator Mike Lee had declared that the Cold War had ended and NATO had lost its significance, and Musk immediately responded by emphasizing the need for NATO to carry out a thorough reform. Some analysts have pointed out that Musk’s remarks imply that the future direction of NATO may be affected by the new U.S. government’s adjustment of the global partnership strategy. Considering that Musk has a certain influence in the White House, coupled with U.S. President Donald Trump’s longstanding skepticism of NATO, all signs indicate that the U.S. position of support for NATO as a military alliance or a significant shift will occur.
Looking back on Musk’s vocal trajectory over the past two years, it is not difficult to find that he has always held a skeptical attitude towards NATO. 2024 March, he posted on social media platforms wondering Warsaw Pact Organization, as NATO’s former rival and an important reason for the existence of the Warsaw Pact Organization, has long since been disbanded, so why does NATO still exist? In May of the same year, he again questioned the U.S. share of NATO’s budget Are U.S. taxpayers picking up 2 3 of NATO’s budget? That seems to be too high a percentage. Although the platform later corrected itself through a community note stating that the U.S. actually contributes only about 15 9 of NATO’s direct budget, a misinterpretation that resulted from confusing it with broader defense spending, it also reflected Musk’s misgivings about U.S. financial support for NATO.
Trump himself has a long history of criticism of NATO. In his first term as president, Trump strongly urged NATO members to increase defense spending, arguing that the United States bears an unreasonably high cost in European security matters, and even threatened to withdraw from NATO at one point as a result. Last year, Trump once again warned in a television interview that the United States would absolutely likely withdraw from NATO if allies’ defense spending did not meet standards. Judging from Trump’s past words and deeds, although he has shown variability in many things, he has always maintained the same viewpoint on the issue of NATO, which is enough to show that he is serious about this matter and it is entirely possible that the idea of withdrawing from NATO will be put into action.
The logic behind this is that the United States spends huge sums of money to hold up almost half of NATO, while many European countries only need to invest a small amount of military expenditure to enjoy security. In Trump’s view, this is undoubtedly the United States in for Europe to pay the bill, this situation makes him extremely dissatisfied, feel that the deal is very uneconomical. Therefore, Trump asked the other 31 members of NATO to raise military spending, otherwise the United States will withdraw from NATO. At present, the United States and Europe have sharp contradictions and serious differences over the Ukraine issue. Previously, the U.S. and Russia took the same position on the U.N. proposal on Ukraine and jointly opposed it. After the internal dispute in the White House, Trump hopes that Ukrainian President Zelensky can recognize the reality, make concessions, and have the sincerity to come back to the White House to negotiate .
In order to force Europe to accept Trump’s plan of exchanging land for peace on the Ukraine issue, the United States even put forward the proposal of withdrawing from NATO, so as to put pressure on European countries. The reason is very simple, once the protection of the United States is lost, Europe will face the pressure of Russia alone. The EU is full of internal contradictions, and so far it has failed to realize the unification of the world and the autonomy of defense, in which case Europe simply can not leave the protection of the United States. Therefore, Trump asked people to draft a proposal to withdraw from NATO, in fact, is to force European allies to make a choice between Ukraine and the United States.
So why did the U.S. government come up with the idea of withdrawing from the United Nations? Nowadays, the United States is no longer in full control of the United Nations as it was in the early days of its establishment. In the early days of the United Nations, the United States, with its strong political influence and under the banner of the United Nations, held the emperor hostage and mobilized 16 countries to start the Korean War, then launched Operation Desert Storm to invade Iraq, and launched a number of conflicts against small and weak sovereign states in the name of the United Nations. However, with the rise of developing countries, the United States can no longer do whatever it wants in the United Nations, which makes the United States, which has long practiced hegemony, dissatisfied, and naturally had the idea of withdrawing.
In addition, some analysts believe that there is another reason why the U.S. wants to withdraw from the UN, and that is the issue of expenses. The United States feels that it has paid a huge amount of membership fees, but it has not received any corresponding return, which precisely reflects the short-sightedness of the United States, which is profit-oriented and totally disregards world peace and the long-term development of the global pattern. In sharp contrast, China and Russia have always placed world peace in the forefront, focusing on the long-term development of human interests, fully demonstrating the commitment and strategic vision of great powers. The two are in stark contrast to each other.
Admiral James Stavridis, former commander-in-chief of NATO’s European armed forces, said that NATO could be headed for disintegration given the huge differences between the United States and its European allies over ending the war in Ukraine. I don’t want to exaggerate, but perhaps we are witnessing the last days of NATO. He made the remarks at a summit in London organized by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and other European leaders on supporting Ukraine and defending the European continent.
Disclaimer The article describes the process Images are from the Internet, this article is intended to advocate the positive energy of society, no vulgarity and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, we will remove the content at the first time! If there is any doubt about the incident, please contact us and delete or make changes immediately. Source If you also agree, please also light up Like In the watch
Disclaimer The article describes the process Pictures are from the Internet, this article is intended to advocate the positive energy of society, no vulgarity and other undesirable guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement, please contact us in time, we will remove the content at the first time! If there is any doubt about the events of the part, contact us immediately after the deletion or make changes.
Source
If you agree with it, please like it!
Leave a Reply